The child lies like a rag doll - a symbol of the latest Lebanon war

By Robert Fisk in Beirut
Published: 20 July 2006
The independence
How soon must we use the words "war crime"? How many children must be scattered in the rubble of Israeli air attacks before we reject the obscene phrase "collateral damage" and start talking about prosecution for crimes against humanity?
The child whose dead body lies like a rag doll beside the cars which were supposedly taking her and her family to safety is a symbol of the latest Lebanon war; she was hurled from the vehicle in which she and her family were travelling in southern Lebanon as they fled their village - on Israel's own instructions. Because her parents were apparently killed in the same Israeli air attack, her name is still unknown. Not an unknown warrior, but an unknown child.
The story of her death, however, is well documented. On Saturday, the inhabitants of the tiny border village of Marwaheen were ordered by Israeli troops - apparently using a bullhorn - to leave their homes by 6pm. Marwaheen lies closest to the spot where Hizbollah guerrillas broke through the frontier wire a week ago to capture two Israeli soldiers and kill three others, the attack which provoked this latest cruel war in Lebanon. The villagers obeyed the Israeli orders and initially appealed to local UN troops of the Ghanaian battalion for protection.
But the Ghanaian soldiers, obeying guidelines set down by the UN's headquarters in New York in 1996, refused to permit the Lebanese civilians to enter their base. By terrible irony, the UN's rules had been drawn up after their soldiers gave protection to civilians during an Israeli bombardment of southern Lebanon in 1996 in which 106 Lebanese, more than half of them children, were slaughtered when the Israelis shelled the UN compound at Qana, in which they had been given sanctuary.
So the people of Marwaheen set off for the north in a convoy of cars which only minutes later, close to the village of Tel Harfa, were attacked by an Israeli F-16 fighter-bomber. It bombed all the cars and killed at least 20 of the civilians travelling in them, many of them women and children. Twelve people were burnt alive in their vehicles but others, including the child who lies like a rag doll near the charred civilian convoy, whose photograph was taken - at great risk - by an Associated Press photographer, Nasser Nasser, were blown clear of the cars by the blast of the bombs and fell into fields and a valley near the scene of the attack. There has been no apology or expression of regret from Israel for these deaths.
The innocent continued to die yesterday in Israeli air attacks across Lebanon. Five civilians were killed when an Israeli missile struck a house near the town of Nabatea. Three members of the Hamed family were killed along with their Sri Lankan maid. In the village of Srifa, in the south, Israeli air strikes flattened 15 houses which were homes to at least 23 people but - with no lifting vehicles able to reach that part of the country - there was no way of rescuing anyone alive trapped in the buildings.
The Lebanese civil authorities, however, were able to give names to the dead after an Israeli air raid on the Bekaa Valley village of Nabi Chit; they included Ali Suleiman; Daoud Hazima; Khadija Moussawi and her children Bilal, Talal and Yasmine; Maouffaq Diab; Ahmed and Khairallah Mouawad; Mustafa Jroud and Bushra Shuqr. At least three of the names were female. Another four civilians were killed in an air raid on the village of Loussi in eastern Lebanon.
The Israelis constantly boast of their "pin-point" or "surgical" precision in air attacks. If this is true, then there are far too many civilians being killed in the Lebanese bloodbath to make every one of them an accident. And since Israel's target list now includes obviously civilian targets - deliberately bombed to punish the civilian population - the evidence is mounting that these air raids are intended to kill the innocent as well as the Hizbollah guerrillas whom Israel claims to be fighting.
True, the Hizbollah are killing civilians in Israel, but their missiles are inaccurate and the West, which has done no more than mildly disapprove of Israel's retaliatory onslaught, must surely expect higher standards of the Israeli armed forces than of the men whom both Israel and President George Bush describe as "terrorists".
Why, for example, did the Israelis attack and destroy the headquarters of the Liban-Lait company in the Bekaa Valley, the largest milk factory in Lebanon? Why did they bomb out the factory of the main importer for Proctor and Gamble products in Lebanon, based in Bchmoun? Why did they destroy a paper box factory outside Beirut? And why did Israeli planes attack a convoy of new ambulances being brought into Lebanon from Syria yesterday, vehicles which were the gift of the medical authorities of the United Arab Emirates? The ambulances were clearly marked as a relief aid convoy, according to an Emirates official. Were all these "terrorist" targets? Was the little girl in the field at Tel Harfa a "terrorist" target?
An example of Israel's lack of care in targeting Lebanon came yesterday morning when an Israeli plane fired four missiles into a disused parking lot in the Christian district of Ashrafieh in Beirut. Their targets turned out to be two derelict water drilling lorries which were standing tyre-deep in weeds. Were the tubes on the back of the lorries supposed to be missile launchers? And if so, who imagined that Hizbollah would ever try to conceal such weapons in a Christian area of Beirut where Hizbollah believe many of Israel's own collaborators live.
In Beirut and Nabatea, Lebanese security men claim to have arrested "collaborators" who were "painting" houses and cars with phosphorus to guide in Israeli jets to destroy them. At the same time, the Lebanese Minister of Finance, Jihad Azour, stated that 45 bridges had been destroyed across Lebanon and 60,000 families - 500,000 civilians - have been displaced.
Thousands of foreigners - many of them Lebanese holding dual citizenship - continued to leave the country by bus and ship yesterday, including hundreds of Britons who started the evacuation on Monday in HMS Gloucester. Americans were leaving by sea, although a French security company in Amman - SPO Middle East - was reported to have been hired by the US to evacuate its citizens by bus at a cost of $3,000 (£1,700) a head.
They, of course, are the lucky ones, who will finish their journeys in Damascus or Cyprus rather than beside a burnt convoy at Tel Harfa.


At Friday, July 21, 2006 12:40:00 PM, Blogger Rob said...

I beg you, don't rely on Robert Fisk to wave your flag for you in the West. The man's very name is a synonym for charlatanry.

At Friday, July 21, 2006 12:42:00 PM, Blogger quantum said...

You know it's getting bad when the arabs have to pull out the execrable Robert Fisk to make their point...and with Fisk, as with too many Arabs, the point is always, the Jews and the Americans are savages, the Arabs are blameless. Comically incoherent.

At Friday, July 21, 2006 12:50:00 PM, Blogger Marcello said...

Bob please, go back to the first rule of journalism: Objectivity. Relay the story and then give your opinion. Dont mix the two. There are always two sides to the coin. Even you should know that.

At Friday, July 21, 2006 1:01:00 PM, Blogger Rob said...

For a start:

"“I travel the roads of southern Lebanon every two weeks and there are no such [Hizbullah] missiles, as the UN force there will confirm… Hizbollah resistance… missiles are a myth.”

-- Robert Fisk, Chief Middle East correspondent of The (London) Independent newspaper, writing in The Independent on April 15, 2003."

Onoly 1000 or 13,000 have fallen on Israel so far.

At Friday, July 21, 2006 1:02:00 PM, Blogger Rob said...

For 'or' read 'of'.

At Friday, July 21, 2006 1:18:00 PM, Blogger imad said...

lazem nef3al 3ashan biladna! foutout 3al http://imad82.blogspot.com

At Monday, July 31, 2006 10:14:00 AM, Blogger Erez, Israel said...

My name is Erez, from Israel.
The "non-existent" hezbollah rockets seem to keep falling on Israeli cities.. strange. They're probably conjured by Nasrallah in mid-air.
Anyway, for all you righteous people, the point is simple. Hezbollah is the aggressor. The attacks on troops, the bunkers and rocket accumulations near our border and the occasional use of them is by no means an act of defence.
What's worse, the hezbollah doesn't care at all for all you loyal Labanese. Otherwise, it wouldn't have provoked us continually, shooting from inside civilian populations. For them, you're just cannon fodder, as opposed to us cherishing life. I pray that one day you'll understand that.
The Qana incident is Hezbollah's doing. They needed a cease-fire to re-organize and to weaken the international support. That's why they use the Qana population as shields for their rocket launchers. You can see the proofs in the movies here:
I cried when I saw the pictures of the dead children in Qana. But I know that the Hezbollah carries the true responsibility for these attrocities. We couldn't let the Qana rockets keep hitting our houses and children, so we hit them back, but first we gave the population warning and time to leave, *several* days ago. We were ready to endure a few more days of rockets, just to give those children a chance to leave safely. But the civilians remained.
It is always so easy for the Hezbollah: they sacrifice the non-fighting civilians by using their houses as shields and hide-outs. If we avoid hitting them, they can keep shooting. If we respond, there are always civilian casaulties, and then Mr. Frisk and the likes of him can sharpen his pen and stab at us in the name of god and humanity.
Know this, people of Lebanon: we love our children and our soldiers very much. There are those among you, however, those who call themselves "the party of god", who think your life are expendable in the name of their god, the sword.


Post a Comment

<< Home